Save time with our cheat sheets, fact sheets, checklists & books!

July 1, 2013

Federal Defense of Marriage Act Ruled Unconstitutional

Print

On June 26, 2013, the US Supreme Court ruled Section 3 of the federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) unconstitutional. United States v. Windsor. Section 3 of DOMA provided that in order for a couple to be considered married, the spouses must be of the opposite sex. As a result, same sex couples were not eligible for many of the federal tax benefits available to married couples of the opposite sex, even if the marriage was legal under state law. Now that Section 3 of DOMA has been ruled unconstitutional, same sex couples are now eligible for marital benefits, providing they are legally married under state law.

As of now, it is unclear how this change will affect retirement benefits. We anticipate that the issues affected would include the following:

  • The availability of the spousal beneficiary options, including the surviving spouse’s option to treat an inherited IRA as his/her ‘own’,
  • Spousal IRA contribution fallibility,
  • Spousal consent requirement for naming a nonspouse as a primary beneficiary, and
  • The spousal consent requirement for distributions and loans from qualified plans.

We will continue to track updates and keep you posted

By:

More

Keep Learning

Annual Benefit Limit

Definition The annual benefit limit for defined benefit plans is the lesser of: A) 100% of the participant’s average compensation for his or her highest

Be among the first to know when

IRA Rules
Change